Anbar Journal of Engineering Science
Login
Anbar Journal of Engineering Sciences
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Latest Issue
    • All Issues
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Guide for Authors
    • Authorship
    • Article Processing Charges (APC)
  • Reviewers
    • Guide for Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Reviewers of AJES
  • About
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Insights
    • Peer Review Process
    • Publication Ethics
    • Plagiarism
    • Allegations of Misconduct
    • Appeals and Complaints
    • Corrections and Withdrawals
    • Open Access
    • Archiving Policy
    • Journal Funding Sources
    • Announcements
    • Contact

Search Results for image-quality-assessment

Article
New Quality Metric for Compressed Images

Fatimah Abdulsattar, Maath Mahammad, Dhafer Zaghar

Pages: 154-161

PDF Full Text
Abstract

The field of image processing has several applications in our daily life. The image quality can be affected by a wide variety of deformations during image acquisition, transmission, compression, etc. Image compression is one of the applications where the quality of the image plays an important role since it can be used to evaluate the performance of various image compression techniques. Many image quality assessment metrics have been proposed. This paper proposes a new metric to assess the quality of compressed images. The principle idea of this metric is to estimate the amount of lost information during image compression process using three components: error magnitude, error location and error distribution. We denote this metric as MLD, which combines the objective assessment (error magnitude) and the subjective assessment (error location and error distribution). First, the metric is used to estimate the quality of compressed images using the JPEG algorithm as this is a standard lossy image compression technique. Then, the metric is used to estimate the quality of compressed images using other compression techniques. The results illustrate that the proposed quality metric is correlated with the subjective assessment better than other well-known objective quality metrics such as SSIM, MSE and PSNR. Moreover, using the proposed metric the JPEG2000 algorithm produces better quality results as compared to the JPEG algorithm especially for higher compression ratios

1 - 1 of 1 items

Search Parameters

Journal Logo
Anbar Journal of Engineering Sciences

University of Anbar

  • Copyright Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Cookie Settings
Licensing & Open Access

CC BY 4.0 Logo Licensed under CC-BY-4.0

This journal provides immediate open access to its content.

Editorial Manager Logo Elsevier Logo

Peer-review powered by Elsevier’s Editorial Manager®

       
Copyright © 2025 College of Engineering, University of Anbar. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.